The FED Weekly

The FED Weekly 7-13 Jun 2026 (Episode 54)
===

[00:00:00]

[00:00:00] Weekly Briefing Intro
---

Welcome to The FED Weekly for 7-13 June 2026, your essential weekly briefing on the policies and proposals shaping your career, your benefits, and your retirement. Whether you’re a current federal employee navigating changes in the civil service, or a retiree keeping a close watch on your hard-earned pension and healthcare, this is your source for the latest news from Capitol Hill and the executive branch.

Each week, we cut through the noise to bring you the critical updates on budget negotiations, pay raises, workforce policies, and the legislative battles that directly impact the federal community. Let's get you up to speed on what happened this past week.

[00:00:43]  Legislative Bills and the Trust Fund Depletion Projections
---

[00:00:43]  Issues That Affect Current and Retired Federal Workers
---

Issues That Affect Current and Retired Federal Workers

Legislative Bills and the Trust Fund Depletion Projections

On 9 June 2026, policy analysts provided a deep-dive update on the newly released 2026 Social [00:01:00] Security Trustees' annual report. The Trustees have delivered a sobering projection, warning that the Social Security Trust Fund is now expected to be fully depleted by 2032. This is an acceleration of the timeline, moving the depletion date up from the previous estimate of 2033.

What happens if Congress fails to act before 2032? Under current law, depletion of the trust fund will trigger an automatic, across-the-board benefit reduction of approximately 22 percent. This matches the Congressional Budget Office's February 2026 projection, which actually estimated a slightly steeper automatic cut of 28 percent starting in 2032. This projected reduction is a massive concern for both current retirees and active employees who are planning their retirements.

It is critical to understand that any automatic cut would hit all beneficiaries equally, regardless of when they claimed. [00:02:00] This means active workers gain absolutely no advantage by claiming their benefits early at age sixty-two. In fact, claiming at sixty-two permanently slashes your monthly benefit by roughly 30 percent, and any future automatic reduction would compound on top of that already reduced baseline.

The Trustees point to demographic realities as the primary driver of this accelerated timeline, citing lower fertility rates and reduced immigration, which leave fewer active workers paying into the system to support a rapidly expanding beneficiary pool. Furthermore, incoming fund revenue was further constrained by the expanded senior tax provisions enacted under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. In 2026, Social Security payroll taxes apply only to the first $184,500 in wages.

To prevent these automatic cuts, several proposals are being discussed in Washington, including lifting or removing this wage cap [00:03:00] entirely, or implementing a benefit limit of $50,000 for individuals and $100,000 for couples, which the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates would impact fewer than two percent of high-earning beneficiaries.

[00:03:16] Fairness Act Payments Rollout
---

Benefit Changes and the Social Security Fairness Act

Moving on to a much more positive financial update, we have significant developments in the ongoing implementation of the Social Security Fairness Act. Originally signed into law on 5 January 2025, this bipartisan legislative victory achieved something federal employee advocacy groups had been fighting for over forty years: the complete repeal of the Windfall Elimination Provision, or WEP, and the Government Pension Offset, or GPO. These two provisions, which were added to the Social Security Act in 1983, historically slashed the earned Social Security benefits of public sector retirees who also received a government [00:04:00] pension from non-covered employment, such as the Civil Service Retirement System.

The repeal is retroactively effective for monthly benefits payable after December 2023, meaning it went into effect on 1 January 2024. During this reporting week of 7 June 2026 through 13 June 2026, the Social Security Administration's June payment schedule is actively delivering these enhanced benefits. For those eligible, adjusted payments are rolling out in waves based on your birthdate. Beneficiaries born between the first and tenth of the month received their payments on 10 June 2026. Those born between the eleventh and twentieth will see their payments on 17 June 2026, and those born after the twentieth will be paid on 24 June 2026.

On average, the repeal of the WEP provides an extra $360 per month to [00:05:00] retirees. For survivors and spouses impacted by the GPO, the monthly increase can exceed $1,000. Historically, the GPO reduced spousal or survivor benefits by two-thirds of the individual's government pension. For example, if a retiree received a monthly government pension of $2,250, the GPO would slash their Social Security spousal benefits by $1,500, often wiping them out completely. With the repeal, these public servants can finally collect their full, earned benefits. Additionally, the repeal has a positive international impact for retirees who split their careers between the United States and countries with Totalization Agreements, allowing them to receive their full spousal or survivor benefits alongside their foreign pensions.

There is also a highly technical, yet incredibly important regulatory update for retirees who live in mixed-income or affordable housing units. Under Department of Housing and Urban [00:06:00] Development rules, there was a question of how the retroactive lump-sum payments from the Social Security Fairness Act would be treated during annual income recertifications. The Department of Housing and Urban Development has clarified that these retroactive lump sums are officially excluded from annual income when calculating housing eligibility and rent determinations. This clarification, grounded in Exhibit 5-1 of HUD Handbook 4350.3, ensures that these retroactive windfalls will not spike your rent or jeopardize your affordable housing status, though you should keep the documentation in your tenant file to verify the exclusion.

[00:06:39] OPM Proposed NDA Debate
---

Regulatory Updates and the Proposed NDA Mandate

Our final topic in this shared section is a controversial regulatory update that has sparked intense debate among federal workers and retiree associations. The Trump administration, acting through the Office of Personnel Management, has proposed a new governmentwide [00:07:00] nondisclosure agreement mandate. The proposal, which was officially published in the Federal Register on 28 May 2026, has established a thirty-day public comment window that runs through 26 June 2026.

Under this proposal, the Office of Personnel Management intends to draft a standardized "Optional Form" nondisclosure agreement. Individual federal agencies would then have the discretion to require any employee with access to sensitive but unclassified information—such as internal personnel records, operational designs, and agency plans—to sign this restrictive agreement. According to the proposal, the goal is to promote consistency across the executive branch, protect confidential files, and prevent unauthorized leaks. The administration cited several recent high-profile disclosures, including a 2025 leak of Department of Homeland Security and Federal Bureau of Investigation immigration enforcement [00:08:00] plans, and an early January 2026 leak to major news organizations detailing a planned military raid in Venezuela before it could commence.

However, federal employee unions and whistleblower protection groups have launched a fierce campaign against this proposed mandate. Everett Kelley, the national president of the American Federation of Government Employees, issued a sharp public warning, calling the proposed nondisclosure agreement a backdoor attempt to purge career, nonpartisan civil servants and replace them with political loyalists. Kelley and other advocacy groups warn that these sweeping agreements will create a preemptive chill on First Amendment-protected speech, making career workers too fearful of losing their jobs to report genuine instances of waste, fraud, abuse, or mismanagement. If you wish to make your voice heard on this, the comment period remains active through 26 June [00:09:00] 2026.

[00:09:00]  Issues That Affect Retired Federal Workers
---

Issues That Affect Retired Federal Workers

[00:09:03]  Legislative Bills and the Fight for Equal COLAs
---

Legislative Bills and the Fight for Equal COLAs

For decades, federal retirees under the Federal Employees Retirement System have pointed out a stark unfairness in how their annual cost-of-living adjustments are calculated. Under current law, retirees under the older Civil Service Retirement System receive a full cost-of-living adjustment tied directly to the Consumer Price Index. However, Federal Employees Retirement System retirees face a capped, "diet" cost-of-living adjustment whenever inflation rises above two percent.

We saw this disparity play out directly in the cost-of-living adjustment implemented in January 2026. Civil Service Retirement System annuitants received the full 2.8 percent adjustment. Meanwhile, Federal Employees Retirement System retirees were capped at just 2.0 percent. This means a retiree under the older system with a $2,000 monthly [00:10:00] annuity saw their check increase by $56, while their peer under the newer system doing the exact same job saw only a $40 increase. Under current law, if the cost-of-living adjustment is more than three percent, Federal Employees Retirement System annuitants receive one percent less than the full amount. If the COLA is between two and three percent, FERS retirees are capped at a flat two percent. And if the COLA is less than two percent, FERS retirees receive the full amount.

To correct this imbalance, legislative efforts in Congress are focusing on the Equal COLA Act, which is introduced as H.R. 491 in the House of Representatives and S. 624 in the Senate. Originally championed by the late Representative Gerry Connolly, the House bill has been taken over by his successor, Representative James Walkinshaw, while Senator Alex Padilla sponsors the companion bill in the Senate. The bill would [00:11:00] permanently eliminate this disparity, guaranteeing that all federal retirees, regardless of their retirement system, receive the same full cost-of-living adjustment. Major advocacy groups like the National Association of Letter Carriers, the National Treasury Employees Union, and the National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association are actively urging retirees to contact their lawmakers to co-sponsor this bill.

This push is particularly urgent as we look ahead to the 2027 cycle. According to inflation data analyzed during this reporting week, the preliminary trend toward the 2027 cost-of-living adjustment is sitting at an estimated 3.6 percent, driven by a 0.7 percent increase in the Consumer Price Index in May 2026. If the Equal COLA Act does not pass before the end of the year, Federal Employees Retirement System retirees will once again receive a capped adjustment—likely [00:12:00] 2.6 percent, representing another substantial loss of purchasing power against inflation. The official 2027 cost-of-living adjustment will be formally determined and announced by the Social Security Administration in mid-October 2026.

[00:12:16] OPM Claims Processing Changes
---

Regulatory Updates and OPM Retirement Claims Processing

Moving on to regulatory and administrative updates, we have some critical news regarding the processing of retirement claims. The Office of Personnel Management has been dealing with an unprecedented workload of retirement cases. This bottleneck traces back to a massive wave of retirements on 31 December 2025, driven in part by agency workforce reduction mandates.

For those who retired under these programs, processing times have been a major headache. While some retirees under the Department of Defense's early retirement programs reported having their cases finalized with full back payments by 1 April [00:13:00] 2026 or 1 June 2026, others have faced agonizing delays. Some spouses of retired employees did not see their final payments resolved until June 2026, and many are still receiving only partial interim payments.

To streamline this, the Office of Personnel Management is pushing hard to transition retirees onto its new Online Retirement Application system. If you are filing for regular retirement, you must call the Human Resource Shared Service Center to initiate your application and transition to the online portal, where you can track your file's progress from your agency payroll office to the Office of Personnel Management. To support this digital push, the agency has piloted an artificial intelligence-enabled chatbot on its website to answer basic retirement questions, with plans to expand its capabilities to job placement and policy navigation.

However, there is an important customer service warning for [00:14:00] retirees who are used to emailing the agency. The Office of Personnel Management has officially abandoned its long-standing email address, retire@opm.gov. If you need assistance, you can no longer send a direct email. Instead, you must visit the contact support page on their website and submit a help request form, or use the toll-free phone number. Additionally, be aware that survivor annuity claims are currently averaging about 26 days to process once the Office of Personnel Management receives a completed application. However, because it takes six to eight weeks for the agency to mail out the physical application after a death is reported, the actual time to receive benefits can be much longer, meaning families should plan their finances accordingly.

[00:14:49] Medicare Advantage Surge
---

Benefit Changes: Medicare Advantage Trends

Finally for our retirees, a major healthcare trend has emerged in a Kaiser Family Foundation analysis released this week. [00:15:00] The report found that a record 55 percent of eligible Medicare beneficiaries are enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans in 2026. While the rapid pace of enrollment growth has begun to slow, the overwhelming majority of new enrollments—approximately 85 percent—occurred in Special Needs Plans. For federal retirees utilizing these private plans alongside or in place of traditional coverage, out-of-pocket spending limits are seeing significant variations in 2026, making a detailed review of your plan's specific limits highly recommended as you plan your medical expenses for the remainder of the year.

[00:15:40]  Issues That Affect Current Federal Workers
---

Issues That Affect Current Federal Workers

[00:15:43]  Legislative Bills and the VERA/VSIP Cash Buyout Cap
---

Legislative Bills and the VERA/VSIP Cash Buyout Cap

First, let's look at the legislative front regarding workforce management. The Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, has been pushing workforce reduction initiatives across the executive branch. To [00:16:00] achieve these staffing cuts, multiple agencies have rolled out active rounds of the Voluntary Early Retirement Authority, or VERA, and the Voluntary Separation Incentive Payment, or VSIP, program.

Under current rules, the standard cash buyout under the VSIP program remains capped at a maximum of $25,000 for non-defense agencies. This cap usually translates to about $17,000 to $19,000 after federal and state taxes are withheld. The Department of Defense, however, enjoys a larger authorized cap of $40,000.

There has been a significant legislative push to modernize this decades-old buyout limit. On 4 February 2026, the House Oversight Committee passed H.R. 7256 by a unanimous 43 to 0 vote. This bill would raise the standard VSIP buyout cap from a flat $25,000 to an amount equal to six months of an employee's base salary. This would represent [00:17:00] a massive financial boost for long-serving career employees considering a voluntary exit. However, during this reporting week, Capitol Hill analysts confirmed that the bill remains completely stalled in the Senate. As a result, the standard $25,000 cap remains strictly in place for now.

If you are considering taking a VERA early retirement or a VSIP buyout, there are several critical rules you must keep in mind. To qualify for VERA, you must be at least age fifty with twenty years of service, or have twenty-five years of service at any age, with at least five years being civilian service. Under VERA, you avoid the standard Federal Employees Retirement System early-retirement penalty, but you will not receive the Federal Employees Retirement System annuity supplement until you reach your Minimum Retirement Age. Additionally, if you accept a VSIP cash buyout and return to any form of federal service within five years, [00:18:00] you must repay the full gross amount of the buyout before your first day back on the job.

[00:18:05] Schedule Policy Career Shakeup
---

Regulatory Updates and the Reclassification to Schedule Policy/Career

Undoubtedly, the biggest regulatory story of the week for active federal workers is the formal implementation of the "Schedule Policy/Career" employment category. Reinstated by the Trump administration at the beginning of 2025 to re-establish the controversial "Schedule F" concept, the policy took a massive leap forward this week. Following the finalization of the rule titled "Improving Performance, Accountability and Responsiveness in the Civil Service" in February 2026, federal agencies faced a hard deadline of Wednesday, 10 June 2026, to formally submit lists to reclassify thousands of career employees.

On 8 June 2026, the Office of Personnel Management issued exhaustive administrative guidance detailing exactly what [00:19:00] this reclassification means for the day-to-day careers of affected employees. Under Schedule Policy/Career, reclassified employees are stripped of their career status and are officially designated as "at-will" workers. The Office of Personnel Management stated that this change allows agencies to act much more rapidly to terminate workers for performance or conduct issues.

The guidance outlines that these at-will workers are completely ineligible for the standard civil service protections and adverse action appeal proceedings found under Chapters 43 and 75 of Title 5 of the United States Code. This means that if an agency decides to fire a Schedule Policy/Career employee, that worker has zero recourse to appeal the decision to the Merit Systems Protection Board. The guidance even includes a standardized termination notice template for agencies to use, which bypasses traditional probationary periods entirely.

[00:20:00] Furthermore, the OPM guidelines reveal that reclassified employees will lose eligibility for several standard career incentives, including pay-based retention, recruitment, or relocation bonuses, and will no longer have access to federal student loan repayment options. While agencies are permitted to establish a separate award pool and a presidential awards program for outstanding at-will workers, the financial stability of these roles is significantly altered. All new hires placed into these reclassified positions must sign formal documents acknowledging their lack of civil service protections, and USAJobs job postings must explicitly state the at-will nature of the work.

This shift has raised serious concerns about the transition of the civil service from a professional, nonpartisan workforce to one built on political loyalty. Max Stier, the president and CEO of the nonpartisan Partnership for Public Service, warned that "harder days are ahead in [00:21:00] 2026" as this loyalist structure is put in place.

In related news, on 9 June 2026, the Government Accountability Office released a report reviewing federal workforce reduction trends and the rules governing terminated probationary employees. The report emphasized that until a final rule is officially issued, probationary employees have highly restricted appeal rights, limited almost exclusively to claims alleging discrimination based on partisan politics, marital status, or an agency's failure to follow its own written termination procedures.

[00:21:36] CISA BOD 26-04 Patch Rules
---

Cybersecurity Standards: CISA Binding Operational Directive 26-04

Finally, for our active federal IT professionals, systems administrators, and cybersecurity personnel, we have a massive, fast-moving regulatory update. On 10 June 2026, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency officially issued Binding Operational Directive 26-04, [00:22:00] titled "Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk". This directive is mandatory for all Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies and represents a complete overhaul of the federal government's vulnerability management posture. It officially revokes and replaces two long-standing security mandates: BOD 19-02 and BOD 22-01.

BOD 26-04 moves the federal government away from flat, calendar-based patching deadlines to a highly dynamic, sixteen-tier risk matrix. The urgency of patching a software flaw is now calculated in real-time based on four binary variables: is the asset publicly exposed; is the vulnerability listed in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog; is the exploit easily automatable by an adversary; and does the flaw grant total system control. CISA will publish the metadata for three of these variables through its Vulnrichment Program, leaving individual agencies [00:23:00] responsible only for identifying whether the vulnerable asset is publicly exposed.

The most aggressive timeline in the directive is a mandatory three-day remediation window. This applies to any vulnerability that is actively exploited in the wild and grants total system control. What makes this particularly challenging for active IT staff is that this three-day window includes a mandatory forensic triage step. Before applying the patch, IT personnel must conduct a forensic check of the system to determine if an adversary has already compromised it, recognizing that a simple patch will not evict an active intruder.

Why is this directive dropping now? CISA explicitly stated that the rapid rise of advanced, artificial intelligence-driven cyber threats is compressing the window between when a software patch is released and when adversaries automate and deploy exploits. This directive directly implements the broader goals of the Trump [00:24:00] administration's 2 June 2026 Executive Order, titled "Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security," which mandated rapid, AI-enabled cyber hardening across federal networks within a thirty-day window. Agencies must immediately update their internal policies to comply with Phase I, and they have sixty days—until August 2026—to fully update their operational vulnerability processes to support the tiered risk model.

Furthermore, under Phase III, which must be completed within 180 days, agencies are required to continuously identify and tag all agency-owned assets reachable from outside the agency network with a routable IP address. Non-automated agencies must report this to CISA every seven days. These tags must include the organization and sub-organization, the environment (production or development), the exposure status (public or internal), and the asset type. Additionally, agencies must [00:25:00] ensure that all assets reported in the Continuous Diagnostics and Mitigation Federal Dashboard include all associated private IP addresses. This represents a massive database management effort for federal IT professionals during this reporting period.

[00:25:15] Wrap Up and Next Week
---

And that’s a wrap on this week’s Federal Workforce Roundup. The landscape for federal employees and retirees is constantly shifting, with major decisions being made about everything from pay and job security to retirement benefits and the very structure of the civil service. Staying informed is your best tool. Be sure to subscribe wherever you get your podcasts, so you never miss an update.

Thanks for tuning in. We’ll be back next week to track the latest developments and what they mean for you. Until then, stay engaged and be well.